Saturday, January 23, 2016

Renewable Energy and Alaska's Economy

Today many Alaskans are thinking about the long term future (20 to 30 years from now) and considering a range of divergent, plausible futures to stabilize our economy at a sustainable level. Bringing our natural gas to market by building a gas line from the North Slope is currently the scenario gaining the greatest attention. Another possibility is to bring Alaska's oil tax policy more closely in line with national and international norms, so we can keep a greater portion of our wealth[i]. A third scenario is to bring energy costs down and diversify the economic base of the state through a more focused development and integration of renewable energy sources.

Looking at the first two, have we accounted for changes to tax and energy policies that could affect the gas line? The global energy picture may look different once we understand the full effect on the market of domestic as well as international carbon pricing instruments. With large sums of money riding on a gas line[ii], how closely do we want to remain tied to the boom and bust cycle of a fossil fuel industry in long term decline? It's a reasonable question, and one many Alaskans are asking.

So let's examine the third scenario more closely, which at least one study suggests is not only technically feasible, but could offer several economic benefits. Many Alaskans are already aware that we have a goal to obtain 50% of our electricity generation from renewable sources by 2025[iii]. Today we generate about 28% of our electricity this way[iv], so we're already over halfway there. This is not an overly ambitious goal, and should be within reach. But to realize the full economic benefits of renewable energy we need to look at a study published this year by Jacobson and Delucchi[v],[vi] that proposes fully transitioning all sectors (electricity, transportation, heating/cooling, and industry) to 100% renewable energy (100% RE). The study compared this scenario with business as usual (BAU), in which we continue to use a conventional mix of nonrenewable energy sources.

According to their study, developing an energy mix for Alaska that includes wind, water (river,[vii],[viii] tidal, and wave), solar, and geothermal to meet the total projected end use energy load by 2050 translates into 14,662 construction jobs and 15,099 operation jobs, each representing an employment period of 40 consecutive years.

Other benefits include an annual estimated state savings of $900 million in avoided health costs (including 84 fewer premature deaths). The total savings, compared to BAU, mean that the plan could pay for itself in as little as 4.2 years, and with a feed-in tariff policy, homeowners could financially benefit from their own renewable energy systems as well.

Encouraged by similar projections of economic benefits, 144 countries have renewable energy policy targets.[ix] Even Finland, at a similar latitude as Alaska, has a plan for 100% RE. [x],[xi],[xii] And as a result, these places are seeing their role in the global industry of next generation clean technology expand through the research and technical experience they are gaining by creating and implementing their plans. Iceland, for example, has already built a knowledge export economy around geothermal energy.[xiii]

This is a direction in which Alaska is well positioned to move. In 2007, Kodiak began a multi-phased, step by step approach that by 2014 culminated in their electric grid receiving 99.7% of it's power from renewable energy sources. That reduced customer rates and stabilized them 3.6 percent below the year 2000 level, saving the community millions of dollars in annual fuel costs. Residents are now beginning to switch from oil to electric heat pumps to heat their homes.[xiv],[xv] In Kotzebue, wind power is already providing 20 percent of average electricity demand, saving the community $900,000 last year alone.[xvi] Between 2007 and 2014 Alaska saw a 20 fold statewide increase in wind power generation.[xvii] There are many more success stories, and they can't be repeated often enough.

Alaska has nothing to lose. Our world class fishing and forest products industries are directly impacted by climate change. Our mining industry will continue to be needed to supply the raw materials to build a clean energy economy, whenever recovering these from our waste stream is not possible. And a 100% RE Alaska, by itself, would not represent a threat to our oil and gas export industry, as the market for that resource is predominately influenced by factors beyond our control. Even Norway, which is currently 98% RE, remains one of the world's largest oil exporters. Have we adequately explored the potential to leverage our renewable capital for a strategic role in the global economy?

Guest blog by Eric Schaetzle, Fairbanks, Alaska

###

[i] http://www.adn.com/article/20150522/no-competition-marks-sells-same-oil-tax-snake-oil-alaskans-already-bought

[ii] http://www.arcticgas.gov/alaska-lng-project

[iii] http://alaskarenewableenergy.org/state-goal-50-percent-renewable-energy-sources-by-2025/

[iv] http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/current_year/february2015.pdf

[v] https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/USStatesWWS.pdf

[vi] http://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/FAQsUSStates.pdf

[vii] http://www.adn.com/article/20150201/proposed-susitna-dam-outdated-option-would-set-salmon-back

[viii] http://lowimpacthydro.org/

[ix] http://www.ren21.net/Portals/0/documents/Resources/GSR/2014/GSR2014_KeyFindings_low%20res.pdf

[x] http://yle.fi/uutiset/researchers_all_finnish_energy_could_be_renewable_in_35_years/8057750

[xi] http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281859277_Child2015_pres_RoleofSolarPVandEnergyStorageSolutionsIn100REsysForFinlandIn2050_31stEUPVSEC_Hamburg_final

[xii] http://www.neocarbonenergy.fi/

[xiii] http://fm.kuac.org/post/fulbright-arctic-initiative-circumpolar-scholars-studying-region-s-problems

[xiv] http://blog.rmi.org/blog_2015_05_19_an_alaskan_island_goes_one_hundred_percent_renewable

[xv] http://www.rmi.org/Content/Files/RMI-Islands-RenewableMicrogrids-FINAL-20151103.pdf

[xvi] http://www.eenews.net/stories/1060026559

[xvii] http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=22752

4 comments:

  1. Hello Everybody,
    My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of S$250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of S$250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:(urgentloan22@gmail.com) Thank you.

    BORROWERS APPLICATION DETAILS


    1. Name Of Applicant in Full:……..
    2. Telephone Numbers:……….
    3. Address and Location:…….
    4. Amount in request………..
    5. Repayment Period:………..
    6. Purpose Of Loan………….
    7. country…………………
    8. phone…………………..
    9. occupation………………
    10.age/sex…………………
    11.Monthly Income…………..
    12.Email……………..

    Regards.
    Managements
    Email Kindly Contact: urgentloan22@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's a chance you're qualified for a new solar energy rebate program.
    Find out if you qualify now!

    ReplyDelete

  3. We Facilitate Bank instruments SBLC for Lease and Purchase. Whether you are a new startup, medium or large establishment that needs a financial solution to fund/get your project off the ground or business looking for extra capital to expand your operation,our company renders credible and trusted bank guarantee provider who are willing to fund and give financing solutions that suits your specific business needs.

    We help you secure and issue sblc and bank guarantee for your trade, projects and investment from top AA rated world Banks like HSBC, Barclays, Dutch Ing Bank, Llyods e.t.c because that is the best and safest strategy for our clients.e.t.c

    DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENTS

    1. Instrument: Funds backed Bank Guarantee(BG) ICC-600

    2. Currency : USD/EURO

    3. Age of Issue: Fresh Cut

    4. Term: One year and One day

    5. Contract Amount: United State Dollars/Euros (Buyers Face Value)

    6. Price : Buy:32%+1, Lease: 4%+2

    7. Subsequent tranches: To be mutually agreed between both parties

    8. Issuing Bank: Top RATED world banks like HSBC, Barclays, ING Dutch Bank, Llyods e.t.c

    9. Delivery Term: Pre advise MT199 or MT799 first. Followed By SWIFT MT760

    10. Payment Term: MT799 & Settlement via MT103

    11. Hard Copy: By Bank Bonded Courier


    Interested Agents,Brokers, Investors and Individual proposing international project funding should contact us for directives.We will be glad to share our working procedures with you upon request.



    Name: Muhammed Emir Harun

    Contact Mail :info.financewizardltd@gmail.com

    Skype: info.financewizardltd@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. They include electric cars and supporting infrastructure, solar, wind, energy efficiency, biofuels, energy storage and more energy jobs

    ReplyDelete

Mark Begich responds to Alaska Climate Action Network's questionnaire

E arly in the campaign season, the Alaska Climate Action Network (AK CAN!) sent the following comprehensive questionnaire to all regist...